Herbert Loyd Lindauer v. The Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority, a Public Body Corporate
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, 312 F.Supp. 1361, denying the application of the appellant to convene a three-judge court, as provided by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284, for failure to show a substantial federal constitutional question, and dismissing the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief might be granted, 320 F.Supp. 332. Appellant had sought to enjoin enforcement of Oklahoma statutes pertaining to urban renewal, 1 alleging that the provisions of such statutes denied equal rights of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- William Odley Tarter, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Fob JamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Smiley v. State of South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1976
- Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Malcolm Dillon v. Ernestine Evans, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Pierce v. KingDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1974