Legal Opinion
Isaacs v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 27, 1966No. 41276, 41527PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PI ALLEY, Chief Justice.
There are two cases involved here, which because of the similarity of issues, have, by our order of November 10, 1966, been consolidated for decision.
The first case is an appeal from the judgment of the District Court of Oklahoma County in sustaining a demurrer to the petition of Roy Isaacs, plaintiff in error here, who, for himself and others similarly situated, filed a declaratory judgment action against- the defendants in error, the City of Oklahoma City, a municipal corporation, the Urban Renewal Authority and the individual members of the Authority’s Board of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Williamson v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- STATE, EX REL. v. Urban Renewal Agency of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- City of Sand Springs v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Jacobs Ranch, L.L.C. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff's Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge Number 188 v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- HILL v. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.