Legal Opinion

Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1972No. 44957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY, Justice:

The Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority, plaintiff, commenced a condemnation proceeding to acquire fee simple title to property owned by defendant Lindauer and occupied by defendant Grace Cleaners, Inc., his tenant. Claiming that the Authority was created under an unconstitutional legislative enactment, defendants challenged the Authority’s right to condemn their property. The trial court ruled against defendants and they appeal.

In 1959, the Legislature adopted the Urban Redevelopment Law, 11 O.S.1971, §§ 1601-20. This Law applies only to cities having a population of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Damus v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. CuzalinaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Damus v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API