State v. Brooks
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Prior to pleading upon trial de novo in Superior Court, defendant moved to quash the warrants as to all three charges on the grounds that the underlying statutes are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad and infringe upon fundamental First Amendment rights. By his first assignment of error defendant how seeks review of the denial of these motions. We find the statutes valid.
*342The statute involved in the cases in which defendant was charged with inciting and engaging in a riot, G.S. 14-288.2, was enacted as a part of Section 1 of Chap. 869 of the 1969 Session Laws, entitled “An…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. SummrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. . HoffmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.