Legal Opinion

State v. Summrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1972No. 53PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

Defendant, by his motion to quash the warrant upon which he was charged and convicted of disorderly conduct, challenged the constitutionality of the applicable sections of G.S. 14-288.4 (1969), the statute under which it was drawn. The court’s denial of this motion raises the constitutional question upon which defendant appeals.

G.S. 14-288.4(b) provides: “Any person who wilfully engages in disorderly conduct is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00) or imprisonment for not more than six months.” (Emphasis added.)

G.S.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. SwannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API