Legal Opinion

State v. . Hoffman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 1930PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROGDEN, J. A

voluminous record and a mass of conflicting testimony present two questions of law:

1. Was there sufficient evidence of a riot as defined by law to be submitted to tbe jury?

2. If so, was there sufficient evidence to be submitted to tbe jury that tbe appealing defendants aided and abetted therein?

Tbe offense of riot has been considered by this Court in three cases, to wit: S. v. Stalcup, 23 N. C., 30; Spruill v. Life Ins. Co., 46 N. C., 126; S. v. Hughes, 72 N. C., 25. In tbe Stalcup case a riot was defined “to be a tumultuous disturbance of tbe peace, by three persons or more,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. Baldwin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. State v. . StalcupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1840
  4. State v. . TyndallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. State v. . DailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. HargettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API