State v. Cole
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
We shall first consider certain assignments of error based on exceptions which both defendants have preserved and argued in their respective briefs.
The defendants insist that the trial court committed error in refusing to sustain their respective motions to quash the bill of indictment. They contend that while the indictment attempts to charge the defendants and their companions or associates with unlawful assembly, 'the indictment does not set forth any unlawful purpose or •any unlawful acts which the defendants assembled to commit; that it does not charge the defendants with the necessary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. . HoffmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. KluckhohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. BurgessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Commonwealth v. SafisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. StroudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- La Grenade v. GordonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- People v. O'NEALMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.