United States v. Larry Rouillard
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
Larry Rouillard was convicted of knowingly engaging in a sexual act with Marsha Chapman Reyes when she was incapable of appraising the nature of the conduct and physically incapable of declining participation in that sexual act, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2242(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 1153. Rouillard appeals his conviction, arguing the district court erred in refusing to give two of Rouillard’s proposed jury instructions and that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Because we agree with Rouillard that the district court erred in its jury instruction…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Willard Dean KirkieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. James BruguierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. James BruguierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. James BruguierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. James BruguierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. James BruguierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012