United States v. James Bruguier
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
MURPHY, Circuit Judge,
with whom
BYE, COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges, join, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
From the time of the enactment of 18 U.S.C. § 2242(2) in 1986, until and after the panel opinion in United States v. Rouillard, 701 F.3d 861 (8th Cir.2012), our court has consistently accepted jury instructions which required proof both that the defendant knowingly engaged in a sexual act and that the victim was an incapacitated person. When this case was in the district court, Judge Karen Schreier heard arguments from opposing counsel before deciding to give the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.