Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. James Bruguier

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 5, 2013No. 11-3634Published

1Concurrence

RILEY, Chief Judge,

with whom

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge, joins, concurring.

Although the circumstances for the victim are tragic and evoke sympathy, I must follow the law. Thus, I concur completely in the court’s opinion. I write separately to emphasize my view that the statute is not ambiguous, and, to the extent it is relevant, the legislative history decisively demonstrates the government was required to prove Bruguier knew the victim was “(A) incapable of appraising the nature of the conduct; or (B) physically incapable of declining participation in, or communicating unwillingness to engage in,…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API