Legal Opinion

Continental Credit Co. v. Ely

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 14, 1917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Actioií by the indorsee against the maker to recover the amount of three promissory notes of $1,000 each, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Hartford County, Tuttle, Jfacts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $3,417, and appeal by the defendant.

Read the full summary

Actioií by the indorsee against the maker to recover the amount of three promissory notes of $1,000 each, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Hartford County, Tuttle, Jfacts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $3,417, and appeal by the defendant. The finding recites that the defendant entered into a contract on May 17th, 1913, with Tomlinson-Humes, Incorporated, of Chicago, by which it agreed to go over all of Mrs. Ely’s, defendant’s, pictures, mezzotints, and prints, and to clean and restore all pictures in her house in Washington, D. C., and to authenticate, through…

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The assignments of error pressed are the following: 1. The refusal to correct and add to the finding. 2. The sustaining of the demurrer to defendant’s motion for a disclosure. 3. The denial of defendant’s motion for a stay of proceedings. 4. The holding, as matter of law, that plaintiff was a bona fide purchaser for value of these notes, and the failure to hold that plaintiff took the notes as collateral security for an usurious loan. 5. The failure to hold that defendant can avail herself of the defense of usury, and of the defenses of fraud and lack of consideration. 6. And in any event…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mercantile Trust Co. v. KastorIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Union National Bank v. International BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Inhabitants of Reading v. Inhabitants of WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
  4. Loomis v. EatonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
  5. New England Trust Co. v. New York Belting & Packing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baggish v. OffengandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  2. Wyoming Inv. Co. v. Wax Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  3. First National Bank v. BroderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Windsor Trust Co. v. ChampignySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. EatonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API