Loomis v. Eaton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Bill for a foreclosure; reserved on facts found by a committee for the advice of this court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDutton, J.
The respondent in this case was a second mortgagee and a purchaser of the equity of redemption of the mortgaged premises. The first mortgage was to the jieti-^ tioner to secure a note for $2,000 payable in three years withr interest annually. The mortgagor died and liis/estate was represented insolvent; The petitioner presented the $2,000 note to the commissioners on the estate and they allowed only .$2,000, although the note had run more than a year. This is all that appears from the records of the court of probate. It was shown by parol evidence to the committee who were appointed to find…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Parker v. Bethel Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- National Tradesmen's Bank v. WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hill v. Alliance Building Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Pritchett v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Shelton v. HadlockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.