Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Broder

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 4, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

This action was brought to recover damages on account of the failure of the defendant to return to the plaintiff a certain note made by one Pratt to one Chamberlin, to which the plaintiff claims title. On the trial the court directed the jury to bring in a verdict for the plaintiff to recover $1 damages and both parties have appealed, the defendant claiming that the direction to the jury to find for the plaintiff was erroneous, and the plaintiff claiming that the direction that the verdict be only for nominal damages was erroneous and also that the court committed error in striking out…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coleman v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. White v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  3. Quint v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Ball v. . LineyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Semple v. MorgansternSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Greenwood v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Tradesmens National Bank of New Haven v. MinorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Samasko v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Goodman's New York & Connecticut Express Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API