Bert G. Gianelli Distributing Co. v. Beck & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Introduction
Plaintiffs are eight local beer wholesalers terminated as distributors for defendant Beck & Co. They appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants entered after defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted. Plaintiffs challenge the grant of summary judgment on each of the three causes of action charged by each plaintiff. Specifically, they contend: (1) plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence to create a question of fact as to whether the contract between Beck & Co. and each plaintiff included an implied requirement of good cause for termination; (2)…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Dore v. Arnold Worldwide, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.