Legal Opinion
Dore v. Arnold Worldwide, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 2006No. S124494PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*387Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
Plaintiff alleges against his former employer various causes of action in connection with his termination. The trial court granted the employer summary judgment, but the Court of Appeal reversed. We agree with the trial court and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
Background
Plaintiff Brook Dore was employed with an advertising agency in Colorado as a regional account director specializing in automobile accounts. In late 1998, Dore discussed with his employer the possibility of relocating to the employer’s Los Angeles office.
In 1999, Dore learned that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Morey v. VannucciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Commercial Money Center, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Skilstaf, Inc. v. Cvs Caremark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Transcore v. Electronic Transaction Consultants Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- SCO Group, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.