Mfg. Co. v. . Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Civil action to recover commissions or balance alleged to be due on selling agent's agreement.
The case was made to turn on whether the plaintiff was entitled to commissions of 5% on sales of defendant's goods, as it alleged, or only 4% as the defendant contended.
By consent, a reference was ordered and the matter heard by Hon. A. A. F. Seawell, who found the facts and reported the same, together with his conclusions of law, to the court.
The referee found for the plaintiff, but on exceptions duly filed to his report, the judge of the Superior Court reversed the findings and conclusions of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Town of Durham v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Miller v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Jenkins v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Lawrence v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Seay v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Brantley v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Seay v. Sentinel Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935