Legal Opinion

Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per Oueiam.

Tbe Court being evenly divided in opinion, Barnhill, J., not sitting, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court is affirmed and stands, according to tbe uniform practice in appellate courts, as tbe decision of tbis case, without becoming a precedent. Mfg. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 201 N. C., 823, 159 S. E., 411; Seay v. Ins. Co., 208 N. C., 832, 179 S. E., 888; Braswell v. Wilson, 212 N. C., 833, 193 S. E., 20; Seay v. Ins. Co., 213 N. C., 660, 197 S. E., 151; Patterson v. Hosiery Mills, ante, 24, 197 S. E., 597; Ins. Co. v. Stinson, ante, 97, 197 S. E., 751.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seay v. American Savings Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Seay v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Mfg. Co. v. . Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Braswell v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Patterson v. Durham Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938