Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Per Oueiam.
Tbe Court being evenly divided in opinion, Barnhill, J., not sitting, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court is affirmed and stands, according to tbe uniform practice in appellate courts, as tbe decision of tbis case, without becoming a precedent. Mfg. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 201 N. C., 823, 159 S. E., 411; Seay v. Ins. Co., 208 N. C., 832, 179 S. E., 888; Braswell v. Wilson, 212 N. C., 833, 193 S. E., 20; Seay v. Ins. Co., 213 N. C., 660, 197 S. E., 151; Patterson v. Hosiery Mills, ante, 24, 197 S. E., 597; Ins. Co. v. Stinson, ante, 97, 197 S. E., 751.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seay v. American Savings Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Seay v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Mfg. Co. v. . Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Braswell v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Patterson v. Durham Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938