Legal Opinion

Seay v. Sentinel Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1935Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pee. CueiaM.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Glarlcson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands, according to the uniform practice of appellate courts, as the decision in this case, without becoming a precedent. Com. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 201 N. C., 823, 159 S. E., 411; Raynor v. Ins. Co., 193 N. C., 385, 137 S. E., 137; Jenkins v. Lbr. Co., 187 N. C., 864, 123 S. E., 82; Miller v. Bank, 176 N. C., 152, 96 S. E., 977; Durham v. R. R., 113 N. C., 240, 18 S. E., 208.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Durham v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Miller v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Jenkins v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Mfg. Co. v. . Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Raynor v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927