Seay v. Sentinel Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee. CueiaM.
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Glarlcson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands, according to the uniform practice of appellate courts, as the decision in this case, without becoming a precedent. Com. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 201 N. C., 823, 159 S. E., 411; Raynor v. Ins. Co., 193 N. C., 385, 137 S. E., 137; Jenkins v. Lbr. Co., 187 N. C., 864, 123 S. E., 82; Miller v. Bank, 176 N. C., 152, 96 S. E., 977; Durham v. R. R., 113 N. C., 240, 18 S. E., 208.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Town of Durham v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Miller v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Jenkins v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Mfg. Co. v. . Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Raynor v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927