Legal Opinion

Seay v. . Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to recover agent's commissions on insurance premium renewals, "paid to and accepted by the (defendant) company, while this (agency) contract is in force . . . limit 9 years."

The defendant sought to terminate its agency contract with the plaintiff, prior to the expiration of the ninth renewal of some of the policies written by plaintiff. This suit is to recover commissions on such renewals up to the 9th on each policy.

Judgment of nonsuit was entered in the municipal court of the city of High Point, which was reversed on appeal to the Superior Court of Guilford County.

From the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Durham v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Miller v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Jenkins v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Mfg. Co. v. . Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Raynor v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seay v. American Savings Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Brantley v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Powell v. . VeaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Powell v. VeaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API