Legal Opinion

Brantley v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to recover damages for alleged personal injury.

Plaintiff alleges actionable negligence and damage. Defendant denies liability. Former appeal reported in 211 N.C. 454, 190 S.E. 731.

From judgment upon adverse verdict defendant appeals to the Supreme Court, and assigns error. The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Barnhill, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands, according to the uniform practice in appellate courts, as the decision of this case, without becoming a precedent. Mfg. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 201 N.C. 823, 159 S.E. 411;Seay v. Ins. Co.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seay v. American Savings Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Seay v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Mfg. Co. v. . Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Braswell v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API