Legal Opinion

State v. Zeimet

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 2005No. A03-273PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.

This is a sentencing appeal. Appellant Robert S. Ziemet disputes the computation of his criminal history score in sentencing for first-degree driving while impaired. Concluding that the computation of the criminal history score was inconsistent with Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines goals and policies, we reduce the sentence to 66 months, the presumptive sentence available under the guidelines when properly computed, and affirm as modified.

On August 6, 2002, appellant Robert S. Zeimet (Zeimet) was arrested and ultimately charged with two counts of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. In Re Welfare of C.R.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API