Legal Opinion
Lee v. Norick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 3, 1968No. 42890PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
This is an appeal by E. B. Lee (plaintiff below) from an order and judgment of the lower court refusing to issue a peremptory-writ of mandamus commanding James H. Norick, Mayor, and the Councilmen of the City of Oklahoma City (defendants below) to reinstate the plaintiff in his office as a Municipal Judge of the City of Oklahoma City. The j udgment was rendered upon the pleadings of the parties, as supplemented by various written exhibits presented at the hearing. No testimony was introduced. The lower court determined, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff was not entitled…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Pitts v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Bishop v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
- City of Wewoka v. RodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Goodwin v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Simpson v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Hampton by and Through Hampton v. HammonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Oklahoma Journal Publishing Co. v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Vinson v. MedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.