Legal Opinion
Pitts v. Allen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 24, 1928No. 18360PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This defendant in error, J. N. Allen, was plaintiff below, having-brought this action to recover certain taxes which he had paid under protest to the county treasurer of Muskogee county, and which he claimed to be illegal and void.
He alleged that four different levies for the year 1925 were illegal and void and set out and numbered each of such levies as a-separate cause of action, making four distinct causes of action.
The first cause of action was that the levy of a one-mill tax made under the purported! authority of chapter 13, Session Laws 1825, was invalid for the reason that the portion…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Edwards v. MillarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- City of Ardmore v. State Ex Rel. BestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Short v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Apodaca v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Jackson v. Denver Producing & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Casner v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Jones v. BlaineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.