Frandzen v. County of San Diego
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This is an appeal from the judgment upon the judgment-roll, and the only question presented by the record is whether the county clerk had authority, as the law stood in 1892, to bind the county by his contract with the plaintiff to print the great register for that county.
In July, 1892, the board of supervisors fixed the price for printing the great register for that year at fifteen cents per name for the first five hundred copies, and seventy-five cents for each additional copy. On August 26, 1892, W. M. Gassaway, then county clerk, contracted with the plaintiff to print the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Journal Publishing Co. v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Maxwell v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harrigan v. Home Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Moch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Whittemore v. SeydelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Weidenmueller v. Stearns Ranchos Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Palmer v. FixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.