Legal Opinion

Journal Publishing Co. v. Whitney

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1893No. 19140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This appeal is taken from a judgment of dismissal of a petition for a writ of mandate after sustaining a demurrer to said petition.

The object had in view by the petitioner was to compel the defendant, who is the tax collector of the county of Los Angeles, to advertise and publish the delinquent tax list in the newspaper of the plaintiff, a publishing company.

The demurrer is general in its nature, and is to the effect that the complaint does not show facts sufficient for a good cause of action.

*284The whole matter turns upon the question whether or not, under the law of this state, it is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte BenjaminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Mendocino County v. Bank of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Times Publishing Co. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frandzen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Smeltzer v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Dodge v. Kings CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Maxwell v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. N. Counties Inv. Tr. v. CadmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API