Legal Opinion
In Re Iulo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 20, 2001No. 560 Disciplinary Docket 2Published
1Opinion of the Court
766 A.2d 335 (2001)
In the Matter of Dennis J. IULO.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 17, 2000.
Decided February 20, 2001.
Anthony P. Sodroski, Philadelphia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
Samuel C. Stretton, West Chester, for Dennis J. Iulo.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.
OPINION
CAPPY, Justice.
This matter is before the court as a disciplinary enforcement proceeding. The specific context is a rule to show cause why respondent, Dennis J. Iulo, should not be subject to reciprocal discipline due to his disbarment in New Jersey.…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Zappala; Concurrence · Nigro.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Stilp v. HaferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- In Re IuloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.