Legal Opinion

Kent v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided January 21, 1999No. 07-98-0073-CRPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

Cortne Lee Kent (Kent), appearing pro se, appeals her conviction for driving while intoxicated. Her four points of error involve whether 1) she was charged with violating a lawful penal statute since the Secretary of State allegedly failed to authenticate the statute as required by the Texas Constitution, 2) the testimony of Officer Truly should have been suppressed because she did not take the oath mandated by article 16, section 1 of the Texas Constitution, 3) she received ineffective assistance of counsel, and 4) the testimony of The police officers at her trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mooney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  3. Dana Corp. v. American Standard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Cheek v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  2. Aguero v. Aguero, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
  3. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
  4. Adonis Renard Tarbutton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  5. Alfredo Paez, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2025

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API