Legal Opinion

In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 7, 2013No. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVSPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony (“Daubert Motions”)

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Toyota’s Motion for Summary Judgment

JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

Table of Contents

PART ONE: THE MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE.....................................1064

I. Introduction — The St. John Collision.................................1064

II. Admissibility of Expert Opinion Testimony and Reports................1064

III. Motion to Exclude Expert Evidence Regarding Institutional Bias of Investigating Agency.............................................1067

IV.…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  2. Town of Westport v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Anthony Vinyards v. Natural Plant ProtectionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Aoki v. Mobilehelp, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API