In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony (“Daubert Motions”)
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Toyota’s Motion for Summary Judgment
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
Table of Contents
PART ONE: THE MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE.....................................1064
I. Introduction — The St. John Collision.................................1064
II. Admissibility of Expert Opinion Testimony and Reports................1064
III. Motion to Exclude Expert Evidence Regarding Institutional Bias of Investigating Agency.............................................1067
IV.…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Town of Westport v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Anthony Vinyards v. Natural Plant ProtectionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Aoki v. Mobilehelp, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.