State v. Carr
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.
2Per curiam
Defendant was found guilty by the district court of a charge of unlawful possession of heroin, Minn. St. 152.09, subd. 1(2), and was sentenced to a maximum indeterminate term of 5 years’ imprisonment. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to convict him and, alternatively, that the court applied the wrong standard in finding him guilty. We affirm.
Since defendant did not physically possess the heroin when he was arrested, what we are concerned with is whether there was…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. LaBarreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State v. ResnickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
4Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LorenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. CusickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re Welfare of LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen SamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Commissioner v. FortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.