State v. Resnick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of conviction of the offense of knowingly possessing and having under control a narcotic drug, to-wit, Cannabis Sativa L. (commonly known as marijuana).
The issue for decision is whether sufficient evidence was adduced to establish to the reasonable certainty required in criminal prosecutions that defendant violated Minn. St. 618.02, which provides:
“Except as authorized by this chapter it shall be unlawful for any person to sell, prescribe, administer, dispense or furnish to a minor, or manufacture, possess, have under his control, sell, prescribe,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pelham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- State v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- State v. DoddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. SiirilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. AliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.