Legal Opinion

State v. Cusick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1986No. CX-84-2153PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of possession of cocaine and was sentenced by the trial court to 1 year and 1 day in prison, with execution stayed for 5 years on condition that he spend 6 months in the work house and otherwise comply *180with the conditions of probation. The Court of Appeals, in a 2 to 1 decision, reversed defendant’s conviction, holding that the state’s evidence was insufficient to establish that defendant knowingly possessed the cocaine. State v. Cusick, 872 N.W.2d 424 (Minn.App.1985). Holding that the state’s evidence was sufficient,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. LorenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PorteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. State v. BreauxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Commissioner v. FortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API