Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Fort

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 3, 1992No. C4-91-546PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

The Commissioner of Revenue appeals from a Minnesota Tax Court summary judgment order that respondent is not liable for the controlled substance tax and penalty assessed against her. We affirm the tax court.

In October 1989, the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Department executed a search warrant on the apartment where respondent and her husband, Richard Fort, lived. The search warrant and supporting affidavit identified respondent’s husband as the individual suspected of dealing and possessing controlled substances. During the search, officers found over 27 grams of cocaine in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State of Minnesota v. Tommy Salyers, IIISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State v. DenisonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen SamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API