Legal Opinion

White v. Merrill

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1889No. 12224PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Action for damages for breach of contract.

Defense, general issue, statute of limitations, and payment of all indebtedness. Verdict and judgment for defendants, motion for new trial made and granted, and appeal from the order granting said motion.

It is unnecessary, on this appeal, to make a detailed statement of the case as shown either by the pleadings or the evidence, the only question being whether the court committed an error in granting the motion for new trial which calls for reversal of its order.

The opinion of the court, given upon determining the motion for new trial, was brought up…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nally v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Minturn v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Loomis v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  3. Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Morgan v. J. W. Robinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Davis v. JacobsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API