Legal Opinion

Minturn v. Bliss

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1888No. 12328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order granting the defendant a new trial. The motion was made upon the grounds, among others, that the evidence was insufficient to justify the decision, and that errors in law were committed at the trial and excepted to by the defendant. It does not appear upon what ground the motion was granted, but, as has frequently been held, if it might properly have been granted upon any one of the grounds specified, the order cannot be reversed here.

There was a conflict of evidence upon some material points, and it is conceded by counsel for…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. White v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API