Nally v. McDonald
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Mendocino County granting a ne\y trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs, and a judgment was rendered thereon. Defendant made a motion for a new trial, and the court granted it. From the order granting a new trial plaintiffs appeal.
The basis of the action was a lost claim against the estate of Anna McDonald, deceased. Plaintiffs sought to prove that the claim was properly verified; that it was presented to A. C. McDonald, executor of the estate, who indorsed his allowance thereon; that the said executor volunteered' a promise to take the claim to the county seat and procure its allowance by the probate judge; and that…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Bjorman v. Fort Bragg Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Larson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.