Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City v. Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1943No. 31540PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This proceeding was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by the city of Oklahoma City. A writ of mandamus was sought to require the county excise board to allocate four mills of the 1943 ad valorem taxes for the benefit of plaintiff to finance its budget requirements.

The petition is based upon the provisions of Senate Bill No. 238, 1943 Session Laws, page 273 (Title 68, sections 287.1 and 287.2, 1943 Supplement to Oklahoma Statutes 1941).

An alternative writ was issued. The defendant excise board filed its answer and return wherein it denied that plaintiff was entitled to have…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Leatherock v. LawterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Herndon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Roberts v. LedgerwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Texas Oklahoma Express v. SorensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Williams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Aubrey v. HuserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API