Legal Opinion

Lighthouse Tennis Club Village Horizontal Property Regime LXVI v. South Island Public Service District

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 2003No. 3664PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, J.:

Lighthouse Tennis Club Horizontal Property Regime LXVI (“Lighthouse”) brought this declaratory judgment action to enjoin South Island Public Service District (“South Island”) from leasing an access easement granted in connection with the operation of a water and sewer system to telecommunications companies for the unrelated activity of installing and maintaining telecommunications equipment. Lighthouse asserted South Island improperly leased the use of its access easement across Lighthouse’s property to five telecommunications companies (“Telecom”), allowing them to travel over…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Steele v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Smith v. Commissioners of Public WorksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Gardner v. MozingoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murrells Inlet Corp. v. WardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Goodwin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Gressette v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API