Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Mozingo

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1987No. 22748PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

In this boundary line dispute, the trial judge granted summary judgment in favor of respondents Gardner. We affirm.

In 1969, the late State Senator James Mozingo, III purchased a piece of property adjacent to his law office in Darlington. The deed designated the southern boundary of the property as “the present remains of the Park Terrace Hotel.” A few months later, Gardner puchased the tract of land which bounded on the south of Mozingo’s land. Gardner’s deed excepted from the conveyance “the portion of the northern boundary of the above tract heretofore conveyed to James P. Mozingo, III.”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullis v. WinchesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. Klapman v. HookSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Wayburn v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. Kirkland v. GrossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Hammond v. LindsaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Kenisha Brantley Greg Brantley, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Republic Mortgage Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. R.J. Griffin & Co. v. Beach Club II Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. PBBM-Rose Hill, Ltd. v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API