Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 17, 2003No. 3696PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Troy K. Goodwin and Fonda E. Goodwin (the Goodwins) appeal the master-in-equity’s order relocating their easement by necessity. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Goodwins originally brought this cause of action against Martha and Ernie Johnson (the Johnsons) on December 18, 1996, in an effort to establish an easement across the John-sons’ property. The disputed property consisted of a road that ran from a public highway through the Johnsons’ property to the Goodwins’ property. The Goodwins argued they were entitled to the easement under several theories, including: (1) an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Samuelson v. Alvarado, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
  5. Jowers v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. M.P.M. Builders, LLC v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. AKG REAL ESTATE, LLC v. KostermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Sweezey v. NeelSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. Murrells Inlet Corp. v. WardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Sheppard v. Justin EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API