Gressette v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MOORE:
Appellants (Landowners) commenced this class action against respondent (SCE & G) for trespass, unjust enrichment, an injunction, and declaratory judgment. Landowners claim SCE & G’s conveyance of excess capacity on its fiber optic cables was an improper use of the electric easements granted by Landowners to SCE & G. The trial judge granted SCE & G’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP. We reverse.
FACTS
A motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) must be based solely on the allegations set forth in the complaint and *379we must presume all well-pled facts to be true.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sandy Island Corp. v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Overcash v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Douglas v. Medical Investors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- McDonald v. Mississippi Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Leppard v. Central Carolina Telephone Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Disabato v. South Carolina Ass'n of School AdministratorsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- The Melrose Club, Inc. v. Onorato (In Re Daufuskie Island Properties, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
- Antoinet Moore v. Green's GrocerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026