Legal Opinion

Gressette v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 2, 2006No. 26203PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

Appellants (Landowners) commenced this class action against respondent (SCE & G) for trespass, unjust enrichment, an injunction, and declaratory judgment. Landowners claim SCE & G’s conveyance of excess capacity on its fiber optic cables was an improper use of the electric easements granted by Landowners to SCE & G. The trial judge granted SCE & G’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP. We reverse.

FACTS

A motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) must be based solely on the allegations set forth in the complaint and *379we must presume all well-pled facts to be true.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sandy Island Corp. v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Overcash v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Douglas v. Medical Investors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  4. McDonald v. Mississippi Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Leppard v. Central Carolina Telephone Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disabato v. South Carolina Ass'n of School AdministratorsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  2. The Melrose Club, Inc. v. Onorato (In Re Daufuskie Island Properties, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
  3. Antoinet Moore v. Green's GrocerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API