Legal Opinion
Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. Badgley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 4, 2002No. Nos. 00-35076, 00-35089PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on March 21, 2002, slip op. 4661, and appearing at 284 F.3d 1046, is withdrawn and replaced with the attached opinion.
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Biodiversity Legal Foundation, several environmental groups, and individuals (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s partial grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees, the Department of Interi- or and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“the Service”). The district court ruled that the Service has discretion under 16 U.S.C. § 1533 (the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”)) to make substantial information…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State of South Carolina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Environmental Defense Project v. County of SierraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Anderson v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Anderson v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Donald Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan Erisa PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.