Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Evans
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 20, 2002No. 02-35761PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BERZON for sections I and II; Opinion by Judge GOULD for sections III and IV.
ORDER
The panel majority opinion, as amended, appearing at 350 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2003), is AMENDED as follows:
On Page 844, in Part IV, after the sentence that ends “they must do so before any taking of a marine mammal”, insert the following footnote:
In connection with petitions for rehearing en banc, the Appellees urged that this case is moot because the whaling quota expired before we filed our opinion. We disagree. First, Appellants’ complaint sought relief broader than invalidation of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Johnson v. Rancho Santiago Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Center for Biological Diversity v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Anglers of the Au Sable v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- California Ex Rel. Lockyer v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Anderson v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.