Legal Opinion
Tyler v. Fuller
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 7, 1990No. 89-274PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This is an interlocutory appeal from a ruling of the Superior Court (Barry, J.) denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The issue presented is whether the plaintiffs’ writ sets forth an actionable claim of negligence against the defendants as co-employees of plaintiff Curtis Tyler such that the plaintiffs are not barred from recovery by the exclusive remedy provision of the New Hampshire Workers’ Compensation Law, RSA 281-A:8, 1(a) (Supp. 1989). We find that the allegations in the plaintiffs’ writ are insufficient to state a cause of action, and accordingly we reverse.
On June 5, 1984,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kruse v. SchieveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Craft v. ScamanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Wasley v. KosmatkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rivera Santana v. Superior Packaging Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
- John S. Porter v. Harold NutterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Thompson v. ForestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Hastings v. MechalskeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Leeman v. BoylanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.