Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Mechalske

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 9, 1994No. 9PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Judge.

We granted certiorari to consider when a supervisory coemployee may avoid liability to an injured employee under the Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”), Maryland Code (1957, 1985 Repl.Vol.) Article 101, §§ 1 to 102.1 Specifically, we are asked whether the respondent, Steven L. Mechalske, the supervising foreman on the worksite, is entitled, by virtue of section 58 of the Act, to the immunity of the supervisory coemployee and, thus, may avoid liability to the petitioner, Ronald Hastings,2 a worker at the site, who was injured by another worker on the site acting pursuant to the…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Hauch v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. SchrieferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Rowley v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. MirabileCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Fregeau v. GillespieIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Better Business Bureau of Greater Maryland, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  2. Philip Electronics North America v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Stock v. GranthamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. KirsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Morris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API