Legal Opinion

Leeman v. Boylan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 3, 1991No. 90-277PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The issue presented on this appeal is whether an injured employee, having received workers’ compensation benefits, can maintain an action to recover for his injuries against his employer’s parent corporation based on an allegation that the parent had the “primary overall responsibility for the safety of [its subsidiary’s employees].” The plaintiffs, Albert Leeman, Sr., and his wife, Yvonne Leeman, challenge the Superior Court’s (Temple, J.) granting of defendants’ motion to dismiss their negligence suit against Boston Sand and Gravel Co., Inc. (BS&G), which is the parent corporation of Mr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. Jarvis v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Heinrich v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1982
  4. Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Swiezynski v. CivielloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Manor v. Nestle Food Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gardner v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. Witte v. DesmaraisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. LaVallie v. Simplex Wire & Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Singh v. Therrien Management Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API