Koslowsky v. Koslowsky

Kay, the appellant mother, contends that the trial court abused its discretion by virtue of erroneous applications of the law. She argues (1) that the trial court did not apply the rule that the mother is to be favored in custody matters; (2) that the court erroneously concluded that there must be a substantial showing of a change of circumstances because of the custody stipulation; (3) that the court erred in considering the mother’s prior conduct; and (4) that the evidence does not support the trial court’s findings and opinions as to the welfare of the children.

Basic to this court’s review…