King v. King
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
Since custody of the children was granted upon the stipulation of the parties without testimony being taken on the issue and no finding of fitness was made, the court’s determination is not res judicata nor does the rule of changed circumstances apply. If the doctrine of res judicata applied in full force in custody cases, evidence of conduct occurring prior to the time of the determination of custody would be excluded on a later hearing. However, the doctrine does not apply unless there has been a finding of fitness. Lewis v. Lewis (1948), 252 Wis. 576, 32 N. W. (2d) 227. Even when such a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miner v. MinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Hamachek v. HamachekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Acheson v. AchesonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Dodge v. DodgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Peterson v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Weichman v. WeichmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- In RE MARRIAGE OF GROH v. GrohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- McDonald v. McDonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Bahr v. GalonskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.