Acheson v. Acheson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The trial court proceeded upon the right conception of the law, namely, that the result reached should subserve the best interests of the minor children. Welch v. Welch, 33 Wis. 534; Johnston v. Johnston, 89 Wis. 416, 62 N. W. 181; Markwell v. Pereles, 95 Wis. 406, 69 N. W. 798. The conclusion of the trial court should not be disturbed unless clearly wrong. Welch v. Welch, szipra; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 173 Wis. 592, 594, 181 N. W. 826. In Jensen v. Jensen, 168 Wis. 502, 504, 170 N. W. 735, the court said:
“The welfare of the child is now the controlling consideration; and with regard to children…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Markwell v. PerelesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Jenkins v. JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Jensen v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Welch v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Johnston v. JohnstonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by22 opinions
- Larson v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Hamachek v. HamachekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Welker v. WelkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- King v. KingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Peterson v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.