Legal Opinion

Dees v. Dees

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1969No. 113PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

There is no legal area in which the trial court has more responsibility than in deciding custody matters.

On the limitations inherent in the review of custody placement orders by trial courts, this court has conceded that “The written record does not afford us an opportunity to see and hear the attitudes, demeanors and appearances of the parties and other witnesses” 2 and concluded “The credibility of witnesses and the weight of the testimony [in custody hearings] is best determined by the trial court.” 3 As a general proposition, it follows that great weight is to be given to fact findings…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wendland v. WendlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Larson v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Kritzik v. KritzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Welker v. WelkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Koslowsky v. KoslowskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. BloomerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Lacey v. LaceyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Balaam v. BalaamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Tesch v. TeschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API