Legal Opinion

Lacey v. Lacey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1970No. 20PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

In objecting to the division of property in this divorce case, the husband cites the 1914 case in which this court suggested: “. . . a clear third of the whole is a liberal allowance to the wife, ...”

This statement has been repeated so often in subsequent decisions that one well-respected law text concludes that Wisconsin, alone among all states, has adopted one third of the marital estate to the wife as the standard to start from, to be increased or decreased only by special circumstances.

However, the varying percentages for distribution reached or upheld in these same subsequent decisions…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wendland v. WendlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Kronforst v. KronforstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gauger v. GaugerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Dees v. DeesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Kritzik v. KritzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Wegman v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Berish v. BerishOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API